On MPs, Pornography and How to Solve the Issue…

So the latest news going around town is that a Member of Parliament was looking at pornography while at work in the Commons. Obviously looking at porn in your place of work is not the smartest of moves, especially if you’re in public life. I suppose I’m also not surprised by the reaction, telling the guy off and saying it’s a ‘women’s safety issue’ or something like that.

However, I would like to solve the issue of pornography in general, and because we live in a world where there are men and there are women, we need to conceive of a universal solution. If the solution (outside of standard procedure) is to simply lynch the guy in public and hope that it acts as a deterrent, then I would not be surprised if it in fact makes the problem worse.

Pornography is everywhere in the world, and it’s the thing that nobody talks about because it elicits such a feeling of shame in the user. The user becomes sneaky, similar to an addict going behind the backs of everyone they know to get up to no good.

You may be searching for an innocuous term on google images, and boom, there come the naked ladies. You may be scrolling some kind of news article, and boom, there’s a popup and another naked lady. We’re dealing with lust, and in the male brain the sight of titillation triggers the instinctive nature of a bloke to want to go and continue his family line.

When the habit has taken over the internet of the user, then perhaps women in real life wonder to themselves ‘why is this bloke not paying any attention to me? why does he salivate to images on his mobile device?’

The answer is somewhat simple, it’s that the images are a projection of fantasy, and there is no realistic opportunity for a real living person to compete with fantasy. It’s almost animal-like conditioning, to turn the man into a simple dog who can’t stop licking his balls instead of going out and causing trouble in the world.

Because the brain craves novelty, the user ends up searching for more and more extreme material and becomes desensitised to normality. This then, logically, ends up with addicts practicing their fetish in real life, fetishes that present as ‘social issues’ that make women uncomfortable in their toilets. Anyone who wishes to enable the sharing of women’s toilets for lust addled blokes is not helping any situation: they’re enabling perversion.

Honestly, nobody wants to know about somebody’s ‘gender preference’ when doing some kind of activity. They would, I would wager, just want to get on with the activity. Forcing sexuality into literally every single discussion on the Earth means that humanity is forever and only thinking about sex, and, as we see in America, this ultimately leads to crazy teachers prescribing experimental hormone medication to children behind their parents’ backs, as well as media production corporations such as Disney encouraging children to think about their sexuality when I believe they would rather be left alone to enjoy their lives.

This is the logical conclusion: the total sexualisation of the world, and it all goes back to pornography.

Honestly, who thought it would be a good idea to allow all people on Earth to have access to an unlimited library of pornography for free? Isn’t it typically said that if the online service is being offered for free, then the user is the product? So therefore Mindgeek (and whichever other shady companies operate these libraries) is literally engineering the world’s supply of men to be horrendous animals.

Then, in part, in addition, they’re also engineering the women of the world to ‘celebrate sexuality’ and dress down accordingly.

And nobody will talk about this.

Probably because everyone’s watching the stuff and would rather like to keep watching it, addict behaviour. Or, if you try and have an honest conversation you get banned from Twitter and get called names.

So then it follows that because the world has started to dress down, the man who is trying to deal with this demon in his pocket now goes on the tube and sees a women with a big bum wearing tight leggings that leave little to the imagination. He cannot not look at the bum, because it is in his field of vision and the space is public.

He then looks across and there is a woman done up in makeup who looks incredibly attractive. He cannot not see the lady. The lady also is wearing the makeup to improve her image, and she has succeeded.

It’s all happening all of the time always.

I don’t suppose that women necessarily want blokes on the tube checking them out, but then if you wear outfits that demand attention, then that’s what you get. But I understand that in a world where you have to compete with fantasy, it’s a logical decision to make to try and attract your soulmate.

I’m not attempting to suggest that women should control what they wear in the world in order to be ‘safe’, I’m suggesting that it is logical that if a woman wears an outfit that offers any degree of sexualisation to the outside observer, then it is logical that lust will be triggered in the mind of the bloke who has no choice but to perceive the big bum, the makeup or the low cut dress.

It’s illogical for Sadiq Khan to post ads on the tube declaring that ‘Staring’ is bad, because is he honestly suggesting that sight itself should be policed? (obviously it’s big daddy Sadiq trying to prove to all the poor, weak women of the world that he will protect them – as long as they vote for him) No, these are not serious solutions.

I don’t think that banning pornography would be a successful solution either, as much as that is the easiest idea to grasp.

If you ban something you make it cool, and then you start an underground trade. You don’t deal with the actual issue that millions of men around the world will be dealing with this phenomenon of having a fantastical harem of cartoon women sitting in their pocket, causing them to create unrealistic expectations of relationships. Much in the same way that Tinder and Bumble swiping causes unrealistic expectations of relationships.

The porn has to be there, in plain sight, but man needs to be shown that life outside of staring at pornography is far, far better than the quick, superficial dopamine hits of looking at a pair of tits and having a wank in the bathroom. The man needs to be taught that by practicing this behaviour, he is draining his life and giving it away for free to some creep called Mindgeek.

No one likes to be duped by a Mindgeek.

Role models need to be projected front and centre at all levels of life, not just royalty, that stable, calm, non-promiscuous relationships are logically better than maintaining a pocket harem.

This way women wouldn’t feel suckered into taking nude photos for OnlyFans as a viable life choice. Webcam models could go and do literally anything else with their lives.

Steve McQueen made a film called Shame about this type of addiction. It is nuanced, it is modern and it requires a great deal of courage to come out and talk about it. Far more courage these days than ‘coming out as trans’. I suspect that the MPs in parliament are dealing with a great deal of shame, but also, shaming as a deterrent is the most shortsighted reaction to one of the biggest problems of our time. It will solve nothing, instead pushing addicts to create greater levels of secrecy and perversion.

There are so many things someone could get up to in life, and these activities are denied to you when you are busy licking your balls. I suspect, in addition, that women around the world would prefer not having to be compared to cartoon characters on porn-tube sites, and feel pressure to live up to novel 21st century expectations to lick someone’s bumhole, take it up the arse and maybe even have your husband watch you cheat on him with another man.

These things are gross and not natural, and literally the only reason someone can defend doing these actions is because they’re knee deep in the smut themselves.

I believe in higher ideals, and wanting to live in a world where my theoretical sons and daughters do not have to engage in widespread societal sex addiction, because I believe there’s so, so much more to life.